Allocation of Resources · 5 question types
Past paper frequency (2018 to 2024)
This topic accounts for approximately 11% of your exam marks.
Externalities and market failure corrective policies are increasingly tested; particularly in evaluate questions since 2020.
A 4-mark "how can the government correct a negative externality" question usually rewards two clearly distinct policies, each with a short explanation.

The government levies an indirect tax on the producer or consumer of the good. If the tax is set equal to the per unit, it forces the producer or consumer to internalise the externality: their private cost now matches the social cost.
On a diagram, the tax shifts the supply curve to the left. The equilibrium price rises and the equilibrium quantity falls, bringing output back toward the socially optimal level.
A higher price funded by the tax also raises government revenue, which can be used to fund the clean-up or to compensate affected third parties.
Discuss whether a tax can reduce external costs [8 marks]
What comes up: An 8-mark two-sided "Discuss whether or not a tax on a product can reduce external costs."
Write (why it can): A tax raises the price of the good, reducing quantity demanded. If demand is price elastic, the fall in quantity demanded will be large, significantly cutting the activity that creates the external cost. The tax also gives the government revenue that can be used to subsidise cleaner alternatives or compensate those affected.
Write (why it might not): If demand is price inelastic (e.g. addictive goods such as cigarettes), consumers barely cut back even after a large price rise — quantity demanded barely changes, so external costs remain. Tax avoidance, unofficial markets, and evasion can also mean the intended reduction in consumption does not occur.
Watch out: Both sides must be developed for full marks. A one-sided answer is capped at Level 2 (max 5 marks). End with a judgement: the effectiveness depends critically on the price elasticity of demand for the good being taxed.
A complication commonly tested: the incidence of the tax (who actually pays it) depends on price elasticity of demand. For an inelastic good (cigarettes, petrol), most of the tax is passed on to the consumer as higher prices, because demand barely falls. For an elastic good, most of the tax is absorbed by the producer (the firm has to swallow the cost or risk losing too many sales).
The government can use laws to restrict the harmful activity directly. Examples:
Regulation works by setting a maximum quantity or by removing the activity altogether, rather than relying on price. It is most effective when the external cost is severe or when monitoring individual emissions is expensive.
The government issues a fixed number of permits, each allowing the holder to emit a specified amount of pollution. Firms that can cut pollution cheaply do so and sell their unused permits; firms that cannot cut pollution cheaply buy more permits. This creates a market price for pollution and reduces overall emissions at the lowest total cost.
Some externalities arise from poor information. Government advertising campaigns, warning labels and school education can change consumer behaviour without changing the price (e.g. anti-smoking adverts; warnings on cigarette packets; school programmes on healthy eating).
The government can set a minimum price above the free-market price to discourage consumption of a demerit good (e.g. minimum unit pricing for alcohol). The higher legal price reduces quantity demanded.